CONCLUSION
In the 20th century, the term totalitarian was born to describe certain regimes that used modern technology to control every aspect of citizens‘ lives, binding them to the state by breaking all pre-existing social bonds. One such regime was the Soviet Union, and there is a growing expertconsensus that China today is likewise totalitarian. Totalitarian regimes utilize any and allmeans in the pathological monopolization of power. Though they deliver an exceptionally lowquality of life to their citizens, totalitarian states are advanced political organisms, punchingabove their weight in geopolitics with their unparalleled ability to keep secrets and executecomplex operations the archetypal example being the clandestine rearmament of Germany inthe 1930s. In the wilds of geopolitics, the lion underestimates the snake at its own peril, andwith lockdowns, the CCP appears to have delivered the world a hefty dose of snake oil.
Both intelligence agencies and scientists may be forgiven for overlooking the CCP‘s lockdown fraud. The scientific concepts involved are complex enough to elude defense officials, while the geopolitical implications of China‘s turn toward totalitarianism are certainly convoluted enough to have deceived scientists. Throughout 2020, lockdown measures have been quite popular, but that popularity is deceptive. For the general public, the idea that anyone might accept some outside incentive to support suchdevastating policies while knowing them to be ineffective needlessly bankrupting millions offamilies and depriving millions of children of education and food is, quite simply, too dark.Thus, the public supports lockdowns because the alternative that they might have beenimplemented without good cause is a possibility too evil for most to contemplate. But thosewho know history know that others with superficially excellent credentials have done even worsefor even less. Furthermore, most of the public believes that if there were anything untoward about the science behind lockdowns, intelligence agencies would stop them. For obvious reasons, those who workat intelligence agencies do not have the luxury of such complacency. Given the gravity of the decisions being made, we cannot ignore the possibility that the entire ―science‖ of COVID-19 lockdowns has been a fraud of unprecedented proportion, deliberately promulgated by theChinese Communist Party and its collaborators to impoverish the nations who implemented it
www.latercera.com
