-
¿Quieres apoyar a nuestro foro haciendo una donación?, entra aquí.
La Tierra Es Hueca, Habitada Y Su Entrada Esta Por Los Polos.
- Autor de tema altazor_25
- Fecha de inicio
altazor_25
Hincha Huevas
- Registrado
- 2007/02/22
- Mensajes
- 0
NEWTONIAN GRAVITY REVISITED
“Newton’s Law of Gravity of one of the most useful mathematical formulae ever devised. This little formula has made space travel and the exploration of the Solar System possible. It made satellites possible.... Scientists use this little formula to gain an understanding of galaxies far away, and indeed the behavior of the universe as a whole. It is now more than 300 years since Newton devised this little formula and we still do now know what causes gravity.”
With this introduction the author then goes into a long, detailed, technical discussion of gravity. He contrasts the theories of “attraction” and “pressure”.
Euler and other scientists believed that the universe was filled with low density material called “ether” (among other things) which exert pressure on bodies of higher density, and that the attraction observed between these bodies could be caused by shielding of this pressure in the space between the bodies. Many inconsistencies with the accepted Newtonian laws are noted.
The mass of the Earth was determined by experiments by Cavendish which have been verified by others. Based on this and assuming that the Earth is a solid sphere, many scientists argue that other planets must be solid also. Dr. Tom Van Flandern, a contemporary scientist who believes in the “pressure” theory exposes contradictions between two dearly-held theories in science. Newtonian Gravity – and indeed any gravity seems to defy Einstein’s Theory of Relativity. Newtonian gravity is accurately measured and proven with the bounds of the solar system. However, Newtonian gravity remains untested in other areas. All we have is a formula. This formula has been used to determine the mass of the Earth. This is based on the concept that for each mass of M inside the Earth, it exerts and attractive force of F. We do not know the valid range for Newtonian gravity.
Inside Newton’s formula is G. G is the “universal gravitational constant”. It is assumed – and assumed is the correct word here – that each mass of M exerts the same force of F regardless of where in the universe it may be placed. It is also assumed that each mass of M exerts the same force F whether it lies on the surface of the Earth or whether it be deep inside the Earth. When using the Cavendish balance to determine the mass of the Earth, it is assumed that each particle exerts a fixed force upon all others. But if Van Flandern’s ideas turn out to be right, then particles near the surface of a planet might exert a force greater than those deep down. The key to all of our gravity is the mass of the Earth. If the mass of the Earth is wrong, then so are our estimates for those of other bodies. If the mass of the Earth has been overstated, then it follows that the masses of all other bodies in the solar system have also been overstated. If the Earth is hollow, then so too is every other planet in the solar system.
Other anomalies are discussed such as,
*
strange gravity noted by pendulum experiments during solar eclipses
*
Saturn’s gravity-defying rings, gravity-defying galaxies
*
“inverse square break downs”
There are four basic forces which are believed to represent all physical interaction in nature. They are:
1. Electromagnetism
2. The Weak force of Particle Physics
3. The Strong force of Particle Physics
4. Gravity
A. H. Cook from the Cavendish Laboratory in England admits that gravitational experiments, even in laboratories, are fraught with danger:
“Experiments on gravitation do indeed present the experimenter with a considerable challenge. First, the forces are very small: The gravitational force between two protons is 10 to the negative 40th power of the electrical force, hence in many laboratory systems the forces are not very large compared with fundamental quantum fluctuations and mechanical disturbances... The forces of gravitation are very small... When the difficulties of determining the mass of a body weighing more than a few kilograms, and the position of its centre of mass, are considered, they effectively limit experimental studies to masses of a few kilograms and distances of about 0.5 m."
How can we be sure that the Earth really has the mass accorded it by Newtonian gravity? Is an experiment, using two lead balls really representative of the entire Earth? How can we be sure that gravity behaves 1,000 miles down in the Earth the same as it does 10 cm down in a lead ball? Scientists are convinced that electric currents flow inside the Earth. These currents almost certainly flow in the same direction. It therefore follows that they will be attractive. Does it not then follow that each mass of M deep inside the Earth might produce a greater force of F than previously considered? If so, then the Earth’s density may be much less than it has been thought of until now. Over and above this theorizing, we still have the excellent mine, borehole, ice-cap and sea bed experiments which definitely show that something is amiss. Regardless of where G was determined, the value of G increased, even at very shallow depths. All this indicates that less mass produced increased attraction. These could be the initial indications that Earth really is hollow.
“Newton’s Law of Gravity of one of the most useful mathematical formulae ever devised. This little formula has made space travel and the exploration of the Solar System possible. It made satellites possible.... Scientists use this little formula to gain an understanding of galaxies far away, and indeed the behavior of the universe as a whole. It is now more than 300 years since Newton devised this little formula and we still do now know what causes gravity.”
With this introduction the author then goes into a long, detailed, technical discussion of gravity. He contrasts the theories of “attraction” and “pressure”.
Euler and other scientists believed that the universe was filled with low density material called “ether” (among other things) which exert pressure on bodies of higher density, and that the attraction observed between these bodies could be caused by shielding of this pressure in the space between the bodies. Many inconsistencies with the accepted Newtonian laws are noted.
The mass of the Earth was determined by experiments by Cavendish which have been verified by others. Based on this and assuming that the Earth is a solid sphere, many scientists argue that other planets must be solid also. Dr. Tom Van Flandern, a contemporary scientist who believes in the “pressure” theory exposes contradictions between two dearly-held theories in science. Newtonian Gravity – and indeed any gravity seems to defy Einstein’s Theory of Relativity. Newtonian gravity is accurately measured and proven with the bounds of the solar system. However, Newtonian gravity remains untested in other areas. All we have is a formula. This formula has been used to determine the mass of the Earth. This is based on the concept that for each mass of M inside the Earth, it exerts and attractive force of F. We do not know the valid range for Newtonian gravity.
Inside Newton’s formula is G. G is the “universal gravitational constant”. It is assumed – and assumed is the correct word here – that each mass of M exerts the same force of F regardless of where in the universe it may be placed. It is also assumed that each mass of M exerts the same force F whether it lies on the surface of the Earth or whether it be deep inside the Earth. When using the Cavendish balance to determine the mass of the Earth, it is assumed that each particle exerts a fixed force upon all others. But if Van Flandern’s ideas turn out to be right, then particles near the surface of a planet might exert a force greater than those deep down. The key to all of our gravity is the mass of the Earth. If the mass of the Earth is wrong, then so are our estimates for those of other bodies. If the mass of the Earth has been overstated, then it follows that the masses of all other bodies in the solar system have also been overstated. If the Earth is hollow, then so too is every other planet in the solar system.
Other anomalies are discussed such as,
*
strange gravity noted by pendulum experiments during solar eclipses
*
Saturn’s gravity-defying rings, gravity-defying galaxies
*
“inverse square break downs”
There are four basic forces which are believed to represent all physical interaction in nature. They are:
1. Electromagnetism
2. The Weak force of Particle Physics
3. The Strong force of Particle Physics
4. Gravity
A. H. Cook from the Cavendish Laboratory in England admits that gravitational experiments, even in laboratories, are fraught with danger:
“Experiments on gravitation do indeed present the experimenter with a considerable challenge. First, the forces are very small: The gravitational force between two protons is 10 to the negative 40th power of the electrical force, hence in many laboratory systems the forces are not very large compared with fundamental quantum fluctuations and mechanical disturbances... The forces of gravitation are very small... When the difficulties of determining the mass of a body weighing more than a few kilograms, and the position of its centre of mass, are considered, they effectively limit experimental studies to masses of a few kilograms and distances of about 0.5 m."
How can we be sure that the Earth really has the mass accorded it by Newtonian gravity? Is an experiment, using two lead balls really representative of the entire Earth? How can we be sure that gravity behaves 1,000 miles down in the Earth the same as it does 10 cm down in a lead ball? Scientists are convinced that electric currents flow inside the Earth. These currents almost certainly flow in the same direction. It therefore follows that they will be attractive. Does it not then follow that each mass of M deep inside the Earth might produce a greater force of F than previously considered? If so, then the Earth’s density may be much less than it has been thought of until now. Over and above this theorizing, we still have the excellent mine, borehole, ice-cap and sea bed experiments which definitely show that something is amiss. Regardless of where G was determined, the value of G increased, even at very shallow depths. All this indicates that less mass produced increased attraction. These could be the initial indications that Earth really is hollow.
Americo133
Hincha Huevas
- Registrado
- 2005/07/01
- Mensajes
- 0
Puro bla bla bla , faltan datos y numeros, sigue siendo basura este tema.
altazor_25
Hincha Huevas
- Registrado
- 2007/02/22
- Mensajes
- 0
Jimi_page dijo:
Corrientes que ponen en entredicho las bases Newtonianas no creo que sean basura.
Para el que le interesa interiorizarse del tema, datos, antecedentes, hay un buen libro:
La Tierra Hueca por Dr. Raymond Bernard
Raymond Bernard - La Tierra Hueca
La respuesta a la pregunta ¿por qué no se permiten a los aviones sobrevolar los polos? Es por seguridad. En los polos es el único lugar en el cual pueden llegar casi de manera directa las tormentas solares, las cuales afectan cualquier aparato eléctrico el cual puede sobrecargarse y provocar un cortocircuito, afectando los aparatos a bordo y pudiendo provocar un accidente. Esto debido que no siempre es posible predecir ni observar a tiempo las tormentas solares, las cuales provocan tormentas geomagnéticas y las auroras polares.
Es habitual que las grandes tormentas geomagnéticas producto de la actividad solar, provoquen cortes de luz en ciudades cercanas a los polos como ocurrió el 13 de marzo de 1989, la cual provocó la interrumpción de la transmisión de energía eléctrica en la estación de generación eléctrica Hydro Québec en Canadá.
Fuentes:
Supertormenta Solar
Tormenta geomagnética - Wikipedia, la enciclopedia libre
Sol « Ahuramazdah
http://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aurora_polar
Es habitual que las grandes tormentas geomagnéticas producto de la actividad solar, provoquen cortes de luz en ciudades cercanas a los polos como ocurrió el 13 de marzo de 1989, la cual provocó la interrumpción de la transmisión de energía eléctrica en la estación de generación eléctrica Hydro Québec en Canadá.
Fuentes:
Supertormenta Solar
Tormenta geomagnética - Wikipedia, la enciclopedia libre
Sol « Ahuramazdah
http://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aurora_polar
nefertiti24
Hincha Huevas
- Registrado
- 2008/05/23
- Mensajes
- 0
Está interesante la información, gracias........no sean tan menopausicos, esto es para entretenerse numás, además no creo que el foro sea para cientificos eruditos, ya que las fuentes se basan principalmente en el wikipedia y en youtube. JAJAJAJA
Salu2
Salu2
D
drOGs_cLp
Guest
Wena info pero no creo nada...
Si la tierra fuera hueca los volcanes no arian erupción, de echo ni sikiera habria gravedad..
Y no estoy muy seguro pero creo que los polos no se pueden ver desde ningun satelite ( Publico como Google Earth ) por los reflejos del sol que se producen en el hielo... igual que en el mar.
En rasa superiores a la nuestra si creo... pero no viven en este planeta.
Si la tierra fuera hueca los volcanes no arian erupción, de echo ni sikiera habria gravedad..
Y no estoy muy seguro pero creo que los polos no se pueden ver desde ningun satelite ( Publico como Google Earth ) por los reflejos del sol que se producen en el hielo... igual que en el mar.
En rasa superiores a la nuestra si creo... pero no viven en este planeta.
BOTTICELLI dijo:Está interesante la información, gracias........no sean tan menopausicos, esto es para entretenerse numás, además no creo que el foro sea para cientificos eruditos, ya que las fuentes se basan principalmente en el wikipedia y en youtube. JAJAJAJA
Salu2
Por lo mismo pos huevas, sin duda que hay hechos y fenómenos que no conocemos y que es altamente probable que no estén a nuestro alcance inmediato, por eso estamos todos acá, pero de ahí a publicar weás, la primera que se te cruza en internet, o creerle y comprarle a un superventas de las ´seudociencias, como si fuera un evangelio, no pos man.
Sorry, si esto es un foro es para discutir y tratar de llegar a la verdad de la información disponible, no para creerle a cualquier lunático qe asegura tener entre sus manos el descubrimiento del siglo: NEGAR TODA EL CONOCIMIENTO HUMANO.
Eso es ser neguista, no? a cambio de otra verdad, que esta haciendo millonarios a Icke, Sitchin, y otros pelafustanes
Acá discutimos sobre los temas que se proponen.
Si el autor se ofende porque no le dicen "wowwww maestro, dónde aprender más del tema, he estado engañado desde que nací, y todo el mundo por generaciones" ....es un problema en la cabecita del autor.
E
enfernando
Guest
Bishulon dijo:
X2.......
igual teni razon... pero no hay que quitar credibilidad a varias cosas que se han escrito y han resultado ciertas
nefertiti24
Hincha Huevas
- Registrado
- 2008/05/23
- Mensajes
- 0
bluesman_ dijo:Por lo mismo pos huevas, sin duda que hay hechos y fenómenos que no conocemos y que es altamente probable que no estén a nuestro alcance inmediato, por eso estamos todos acá, pero de ahí a publicar weás, la primera que se te cruza en internet, o creerle y comprarle a un superventas de las ´seudociencias, como si fuera un evangelio, no pos man.
Sorry, si esto es un foro es para discutir y tratar de llegar a la verdad de la información disponible, no para creerle a cualquier lunático qe asegura tener entre sus manos el descubrimiento del siglo: NEGAR TODA EL CONOCIMIENTO HUMANO.
Eso es ser neguista, no? a cambio de otra verdad, que esta haciendo millonarios a Icke, Sitchin, y otros pelafustanes
Acá discutimos sobre los temas que se proponen.
Si el autor se ofende porque no le dicen "wowwww maestro, dónde aprender más del tema, he estado engañado desde que nací, y todo el mundo por generaciones" ....es un problema en la cabecita del autor.
Me cagaste....... no voy a poder dormir hoy día .....tranquilo hombre.
PD. No voy a poder dormir hoy día porque tengo que trabajar JOJJOJOO Salu2
solita1989
(Mail No Confirmado)
- Registrado
- 2007/06/15
- Mensajes
- 0
interesante
Honda pa q ocultar una cosa geografica que podria ser pillada de miles de formas.....porq justo entradas por los polos.....es reloka la huea...honda si fuera asi el agua los glaciares porq xuxa no se caen a ese supuesto hueco.....no lo creo muxo superaria todas las leyes de la fisica ...
marcosilva909
Hincha Huevas
- Registrado
- 2007/10/18
- Mensajes
- 5
juancuco dijo:
mañana mismo agarro un pala y empiezo ha hacer mi entrada para el mundo interior. Tantos años y tan equivocado que estaba.
Eso si, cuando llegue al centro, me voy a caer o la gravedad del sol interior me va a ayudar a caminar sin caerme la centro? Que alguien se raje con el dato.
minegritocl
Hincha Huevas
- Registrado
- 2008/06/03
- Mensajes
- 0
gracias a smokers y sus temas 100% verdaderos me costo dormir varias noches
gracias smokers..
gracias smokers..
Insane576 dijo:
Claro, pero eso fue gracias a que la "Santa" Iglesia Católica imponía su dogma por sobre lo que se observaba (hechos), vale decir, la gente tenía que creer lo que ellos querían, y el que no lo hacía era hereje y merecía ser elimiando. Si no fuere por esos "dudosos científicos" que descubrieron y siguen descubriendo la verdad de las cosas y cómo funcionan, no estaríamos discutiéndolo ahora en un foro, no tendríamos vacunas, no tendríamos casi nada de lo que estamos tan acostumbrados y damos por hecho.